<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tom Ascol Responds to the Anti-Calvinism in the SBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timmybrister.com/2008/11/26/tom-ascol-responds-to-the-anti-calvinism-in-the-sbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/11/26/tom-ascol-responds-to-the-anti-calvinism-in-the-sbc/</link>
	<description>Trusting God :: Treasuring Christ :: Triumphing the Gospel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMurray</title>
		<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/11/26/tom-ascol-responds-to-the-anti-calvinism-in-the-sbc/#comment-41783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BMurray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timmybrister.wordpress.com/?p=2839#comment-41783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am looking for the text of David Miller&#039;s open letter in response to the John 3:16 conference.  Did have a copy on my computer, but it ate the file . . . .  Anyone have a URL or link for this letter?  Thanks for the help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am looking for the text of David Miller&#8217;s open letter in response to the John 3:16 conference.  Did have a copy on my computer, but it ate the file . . . .  Anyone have a URL or link for this letter?  Thanks for the help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Craggs</title>
		<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/11/26/tom-ascol-responds-to-the-anti-calvinism-in-the-sbc/#comment-38841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George Craggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timmybrister.wordpress.com/?p=2839#comment-38841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Timmy,

Do you have any comments on the &#039;former Calvinist saved out of Calvinism&#039; who gave his &#039;testimony&#039; at the John 3:16 conference?

At James White&#039;s blog I have just seen this chap give his testimony, and David Allen&#039;s response. 
Would love some comment from you, and from anyone who was at the conference.

In Christ.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Timmy,</p>
<p>Do you have any comments on the &#8216;former Calvinist saved out of Calvinism&#8217; who gave his &#8216;testimony&#8217; at the John 3:16 conference?</p>
<p>At James White&#8217;s blog I have just seen this chap give his testimony, and David Allen&#8217;s response.<br />
Would love some comment from you, and from anyone who was at the conference.</p>
<p>In Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Light of the Gospel &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the Anti-Calvinism in the SBC</title>
		<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/11/26/tom-ascol-responds-to-the-anti-calvinism-in-the-sbc/#comment-38839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Light of the Gospel &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the Anti-Calvinism in the SBC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timmybrister.wordpress.com/?p=2839#comment-38839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] way. So Phil Johnson responds to Allen (again). For other issues, Timmy Brister has a summary post here, writing: Last week, I directed you to read the words of Voddie Baucham on the anti-Calvinism in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way. So Phil Johnson responds to Allen (again). For other issues, Timmy Brister has a summary post here, writing: Last week, I directed you to read the words of Voddie Baucham on the anti-Calvinism in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Alford</title>
		<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/11/26/tom-ascol-responds-to-the-anti-calvinism-in-the-sbc/#comment-38832</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Alford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timmybrister.wordpress.com/?p=2839#comment-38832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SBC Calvinist are: &quot;Young, Restless, and Reformed!&quot;

While

The SBC Anti-Calvinist are: &quot;Old, Angry, and Arminian!&quot; 

From the comments I am reading on many blogs... the John 3:16/Anti-Calvinist are loosing ground in the SBC fast!

Grace Always,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SBC Calvinist are: &#8220;Young, Restless, and Reformed!&#8221;</p>
<p>While</p>
<p>The SBC Anti-Calvinist are: &#8220;Old, Angry, and Arminian!&#8221; </p>
<p>From the comments I am reading on many blogs&#8230; the John 3:16/Anti-Calvinist are loosing ground in the SBC fast!</p>
<p>Grace Always,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jery</title>
		<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/11/26/tom-ascol-responds-to-the-anti-calvinism-in-the-sbc/#comment-38828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timmybrister.wordpress.com/?p=2839#comment-38828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The comments to that post are very revealing.

I had to chuckle concerning the veiled comments a to what a &quot;bad boy&quot; Timmy has been.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments to that post are very revealing.</p>
<p>I had to chuckle concerning the veiled comments a to what a &#8220;bad boy&#8221; Timmy has been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hughuenot</title>
		<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/11/26/tom-ascol-responds-to-the-anti-calvinism-in-the-sbc/#comment-38826</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hughuenot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timmybrister.wordpress.com/?p=2839#comment-38826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all due respect, the Yarnell / Ascol stuff is not all that worthwhile, and far too much is made of the strange &quot;love&quot; the purported SBC Calvinists show toward the anti-gospel bunch in their midst.  If Spurgeon was right that Calvinism IS the gospel, and if the rejections and ejections by the synodists at Dort were prudent, and if Rom. 16:17-19; 2 Thes. 3:6, 14f; &amp; Titus 3:10f apply, why are we directed to READ the likes of Yarnell, Lemke, ad nauseam, and not rather, reprove these (and, barring their repentance) be done with them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect, the Yarnell / Ascol stuff is not all that worthwhile, and far too much is made of the strange &#8220;love&#8221; the purported SBC Calvinists show toward the anti-gospel bunch in their midst.  If Spurgeon was right that Calvinism IS the gospel, and if the rejections and ejections by the synodists at Dort were prudent, and if Rom. 16:17-19; 2 Thes. 3:6, 14f; &amp; Titus 3:10f apply, why are we directed to READ the likes of Yarnell, Lemke, ad nauseam, and not rather, reprove these (and, barring their repentance) be done with them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin L. Howard</title>
		<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/11/26/tom-ascol-responds-to-the-anti-calvinism-in-the-sbc/#comment-38825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin L. Howard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timmybrister.wordpress.com/?p=2839#comment-38825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Timmy,

I have a lot of sympathy for what you and Ascol have to say.  There are many in the SBC who don’t understand Calvinism or the larger issues at stake within Reformed Theology.  

You&#039;re probably aware by now, too, of Lumkins&#039; post, entitled, &quot;HyperCalvinism: Professor David Allen Responds to Critics&quot; (http://peterlumpkins.typepad.com/peter_lumpkins/2008/11/hypercalvinism-professor-david-allen-responds-to-critics-1.html).  It&#039;s interesting, to say the least.

Blessings in Jesus,
kev]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timmy,</p>
<p>I have a lot of sympathy for what you and Ascol have to say.  There are many in the SBC who don’t understand Calvinism or the larger issues at stake within Reformed Theology.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re probably aware by now, too, of Lumkins&#8217; post, entitled, &#8220;HyperCalvinism: Professor David Allen Responds to Critics&#8221; (<a href="http://peterlumpkins.typepad.com/peter_lumpkins/2008/11/hypercalvinism-professor-david-allen-responds-to-critics-1.html" rel="nofollow">http://peterlumpkins.typepad.com/peter_lumpkins/2008/11/hypercalvinism-professor-david-allen-responds-to-critics-1.html</a>).  It&#8217;s interesting, to say the least.</p>
<p>Blessings in Jesus,<br />
kev</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

