<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comment&#252;s on: Book Review: Communion with the Triune God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timmybrister.com/2008/01/09/book-review-communion-with-the-triune-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/01/09/book-review-communion-with-the-triune-god/</link>
	<description>Trusting God :: Treasuring Christ :: Triumphing the Gospel</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harold Brown</title>
		<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/01/09/book-review-communion-with-the-triune-god/#comment-38680</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timmybrister.com/2008/01/09/book-review-communion-with-the-triune-god/#comment-38680</guid>
		<description>Greetings,
   I learned of God's Sovereign Grace by Revelation . No man can teach like God ! No matter what we read or hear, unless the Lord open our understranding, what did we learn ?  Luke 24:45  "And they shall be all taught of God ." John 6:45
   Am I against reading and hearing ?  No, for we are instructed to do so . But unless it comes to you in power, and in the Holy Ghost, don't assume you learned anyhting from God just by reading and hearing .  1 Thessalonians 1:4,5

In His service,
Harold Brown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings,<br />
   I learned of God&#8217;s Sovereign Grace by Revelation . No man can teach like God ! No matter what we read or hear, unless the Lord open our understranding, what did we learn ?  Luke 24:45  &#8220;And they shall be all taught of God .&#8221; John 6:45<br />
   Am I against reading and hearing ?  No, for we are instructed to do so . But unless it comes to you in power, and in the Holy Ghost, don&#8217;t assume you learned anyhting from God just by reading and hearing .  1 Thessalonians 1:4,5</p>
<p>In His service,<br />
Harold Brown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thirsting &#171; Christian Smoker</title>
		<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/01/09/book-review-communion-with-the-triune-god/#comment-36720</link>
		<dc:creator>Thirsting &#171; Christian Smoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timmybrister.com/2008/01/09/book-review-communion-with-the-triune-god/#comment-36720</guid>
		<description>[...] Irish Calvinist (M), Provocations &#38; Pantings (L), The Shepherd’s Scrapbook (L), Tolle Lege [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Irish Calvinist (M), Provocations &amp; Pantings (L), The Shepherd’s Scrapbook (L), Tolle Lege [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.L. Kane</title>
		<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/01/09/book-review-communion-with-the-triune-god/#comment-33112</link>
		<dc:creator>D.L. Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timmybrister.com/2008/01/09/book-review-communion-with-the-triune-god/#comment-33112</guid>
		<description>Excellent Review!  What struck me while reading this book (specifically the chapters on the Holy Spirit) was the sharp contrast between John Owen and many modern day reformed pastors and Christian writers.  It has been my experience that in many reformed churches today, the Holy Spirit is rarely mentioned from the pulpit or in prayer.  It is almost as though “Grace” has replaced the Holy Spirit as the third person of the Trinity.

I believe that this phenomenon has occurred (primarily but not exclusively) as a result of the Charismatic Movement.  Many reformed pastors are so against that movement (and in most cases rightfully so) that they have swung in the opposite direction out of fear and/or in their attempt to avoid the “charismatic” error.  In my opinion, they are just as guilty of error.  As with any doctrine there are extremes on both sides. Just as there is hyper-Calvinism, I believe there is also hyper-cessationism in many modern reformed churches.  Although many charismatics have given a higher priority to experience than to relationship; rationalistic evangelicals have just as frequently given a higher priority to knowledge than to relationship.  Both of these miss the mark.

I am encouraged by the resurgence of these great works and will continue to pray that God will use them to revive His people!

As Owen stated, “The first way that Satan tried to cast contempt on the work of the Spirit was by setting up a ministry without the Spirit.”  

Blessings to you – For His Sake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent Review!  What struck me while reading this book (specifically the chapters on the Holy Spirit) was the sharp contrast between John Owen and many modern day reformed pastors and Christian writers.  It has been my experience that in many reformed churches today, the Holy Spirit is rarely mentioned from the pulpit or in prayer.  It is almost as though “Grace” has replaced the Holy Spirit as the third person of the Trinity.</p>
<p>I believe that this phenomenon has occurred (primarily but not exclusively) as a result of the Charismatic Movement.  Many reformed pastors are so against that movement (and in most cases rightfully so) that they have swung in the opposite direction out of fear and/or in their attempt to avoid the “charismatic” error.  In my opinion, they are just as guilty of error.  As with any doctrine there are extremes on both sides. Just as there is hyper-Calvinism, I believe there is also hyper-cessationism in many modern reformed churches.  Although many charismatics have given a higher priority to experience than to relationship; rationalistic evangelicals have just as frequently given a higher priority to knowledge than to relationship.  Both of these miss the mark.</p>
<p>I am encouraged by the resurgence of these great works and will continue to pray that God will use them to revive His people!</p>
<p>As Owen stated, “The first way that Satan tried to cast contempt on the work of the Spirit was by setting up a ministry without the Spirit.”  </p>
<p>Blessings to you – For His Sake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pseudo-Polymath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wednesday Highlights</title>
		<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/01/09/book-review-communion-with-the-triune-god/#comment-33056</link>
		<dc:creator>Pseudo-Polymath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wednesday Highlights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timmybrister.com/2008/01/09/book-review-communion-with-the-triune-god/#comment-33056</guid>
		<description>[...] An older book, reviewed, on Trinity. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An older book, reviewed, on Trinity. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Reviews</title>
		<link>http://timmybrister.com/2008/01/09/book-review-communion-with-the-triune-god/#comment-33046</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timmybrister.com/2008/01/09/book-review-communion-with-the-triune-god/#comment-33046</guid>
		<description>[...] Per &#38; Britt wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThis book represents a reprint of John Owen’s classic treatise on the Trinity, which was originally published in 1657. This edition, however, is much more than a reprint. It is chock full of extras designed to enhance Owen’s exposition &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Per &amp; Britt wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThis book represents a reprint of John Owen’s classic treatise on the Trinity, which was originally published in 1657. This edition, however, is much more than a reprint. It is chock full of extras designed to enhance Owen’s exposition &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
